Comments on: Beyond Absurdity to Implosion

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:09:17 +0000

Thank you, Flanders Fields. Your own post on these incidents provides an incisive (and alarming) perspective on the enemy within.

By: Flanders Fields

Flanders Fields — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:10 +0000

Good article, Gary. This should be a confirmation as to how invasive this assault on freedom is. These are not mislead people who are misinterpreting law. They are intentional agents for reducing our liberties until their programs are fully implemented. Freedom is their enemy and they intend to stamp it out. They have succeeded to a far greater extent than I had ever thought I would see.

What is missing Steve is your outrage. I think you must have been in reeducation camp for too long. Gradual indoctrination tends to make you look at “legalities” instead of the rights and wrongs.

http://myflandersfields.blogspot.com/2008/04/enemy-within-our-infrastructure.html

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:28:01 +0000

Steve_G: Yes, it has been some time since the incident involving the photographer occurred. The courts have not yet ruled, however.

“Is it true?” — Not sure what you’re referring to. Are you questioning the veracity of the story in the Albuquerque Journal?

By: Steve_G

Steve_G — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:21:03 +0000

This news is over 2 years old. Everyone online has commented on it, but try to find the source is not so easy. My question is, is it true and did th NMHRC win it’s suit? That’s what’s missing in a story like this.

By: Shayne

Shayne — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:27:56 +0000

There is quite a bit of non-white favoritism in the public sphere. And as your article mentioned, it’s unabashed until challenged, at which point a nonsensical answer is given. However, in the private sector there is quite a bit of white favoritism. This, to the degree to which it’s increased over the years, is likely a reactionary defense mechanism. The sort of diversity the media encourages is wholly divisive.

To your final quip there: I’m increasingly disappointed by the “green??? machine (not that I was ever satisfied with it to begin with). Environmentalism has been co-opted by the mass-producing global economy. Dose that make any sense to anybody? How could a billion of any product be “good??? for the environment?

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:32:39 +0000

It’s announced in the same breath that both diversity and inclusiveness are aimed at – apparently without any understanding that they are mutually exclusive. It looks like the Sandia management is bewitched by PC incantations and reason has been expelled from its office.

On the schemes and tenacity of the social engineers: We are watching a poisonous horse-opera that’s in for a long run.

I guess the American South West is like every place else – in the sense that every locality is populated by many people with whom it would be distressing to be acquainted.